A Jetstar engineer who performed a sensible joke on apprentices, inflicting a ‘potential security danger’, has had his unfair dismissal case dropped after the Truthful Work Fee discovered that his conduct warranted dismissal.
After Jarrod Mcrae left two apprentices stranded six metres within the air beneath a 787’s wing, the fee dominated that his engagement in “horseplay, skylarking or sensible jokes” was a breach of his employer’s cardinal guidelines, figuring out that his misconduct was a sound purpose for dismissal.
This content material is obtainable completely to Australian Aviation members.
To proceed studying the remainder of this text, please login.
To unlock all Australian Aviation journal content material and once more limitless entry to our day by day information and options, change into a member right this moment!
A month-to-month membership is simply $5.99 or save with our annual plans.
See advantages
Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
Entry to In Focus stories each month on our web site
MOST POPULAR
PRINT + DIGITAL
See advantages
Limitless entry to all Australian Aviation digital content material
Entry to the Australian Aviation app
Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
Entry to In Focus stories each month on our web site
Entry to our Behind the Lens picture galleries and different unique content material
Each day information updates by way of our electronic mail bulletin
DIGITAL
See advantages
Limitless entry to all Australian Aviation digital content material
Entry to the Australian Aviation app
Australian Aviation quarterly print & digital magazines
Entry to In Focus stories each month on our web site
Entry to our Behind the Lens picture galleries and different unique content material
Each day information updates by way of our electronic mail bulletin
The engineer pleaded to his employer on the day he was dismissed for misconduct, saying: “I hoped somebody might see via all of the lies and make a judgment name to offer me one other probability.”
Having a complete of 23 years of expertise, and two years working for Jetstar, Mcrae was discovered by the fee to have felt an impulse to repeatedly inject himself into an apprentice plane upkeep engineer’s orbit.
The fee discovered that when Mcrae did this, the apprentice reported that he got here throughout as overbearing and antagonistic.
Regardless of this, the fee discovered that Mcrae held the agency view that as a senior to the apprentice, “it was his prerogative and proper to journey [the apprentice] onerous”.
It famous that there’s an “ever-decreasing minority that also thinks apprentice hazing is humorous and one thing that ought to simply be accepted”.
As a consequence of Mcrae’s conduct towards the apprentice, he submitted: “[Mcrae] made me really feel like coming to work was unsafe for me and that I mustn’t voice my considerations in concern of being negatively perceived by him and others. I concern/feared [sic] that he might take bodily motion towards me for talking up towards him.”
“You’re all p**sies now, it’s ridiculous, again once I was an apprentice, we used to cop all types of abuse,” the fee discovered Mcrae instructed the apprentices.
The incident
Within the incident, two Jetstar apprentice plane upkeep engineers had been doing greasing work on a Boeing 787 whereas elevated on a platform six metres above floor.
Because the senior engineer supervising the apprentices, Mcrae requested them to decrease the platform to permit him to get off; after which the apprentices re-raised the platform, and observed that Mcrae “disappeared for a time frame”.
Mcrae allegedly reappeared and laughed on the pair as he walked in direction of the raised platform, earlier than strolling off to lunch, leaving the apprentices alone within the hangar.
Shortly after, the apprentices found that the platform’s energy provide had been switched off and couldn’t decrease the platform to return to the bottom.
They known as for assist and waited roughly 10 minutes earlier than one other apprentice got here and helped them off the platform. They had been knowledgeable that the emergency cease had been pressed, which lower the platform’s energy provide.
The apprentice stated that he didn’t name Mcrae or one other non-apprentice worker to assist as a result of he didn’t wish to “add gas to the hearth”.
“There was no operational purpose to take action, there was no safety-related purpose to take action, it was unauthorised; [the apprentices] had been ‘caught’ consequently and unable to get down independently, he knew, or should have recognized that his actions had been a possible security danger and, but, laughed,” the fee decided.
Mcrae denied the apprentice’s model of occasions, giving proof that he pressed the emergency button to speak with the apprentices about his operational considerations, stating that he wouldn’t have been capable of hear him over the noise emitted by the elevated platform’s motor.
The fee rejected his proof, discovering {that a} recreation of the state of affairs revealed that clear communication was attainable with the platform motor switched on.
The commissioner dominated that Mcrae’s actions within the incident constituted misconduct that warranted termination, dismissing the engineer’s unfair dismissal software.
The case quotation: Jarrod Mcrae v Jetstar Airways Pty Restricted (U2025/13509).
