The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 is likely one of the most placing airliners ever made. With its widebody configuration and distinctive trijet configuration, the MD-11 stands out from different airliners. Its design is even distinctive amongst different trijets. The MD-11 and its predecessor, the DC-10, had been workhorses for big airways, particularly for cargo airways within the case of the MD-11. Nevertheless, the trijet design that outlined the MD-11 and the DC-10 ended up being the downfall of the mannequin as a complete.
The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 was an evolution of the DC-10. The DC-10 was McDonnell Douglas’s first widebody program, and the primary plane sort to be launched after the 1967 merger of Douglas Plane Firm and McDonnell Plane. Its smaller dimension in comparison with the Boeing 747 improved its versatility, whereas its widebody design meant that it nonetheless had the identical improved working economics of a widebody airliner. It competed primarily in opposition to the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, however the two plane featured vital variations in design, together with the tail engine.
Overview Of The McDonnell Douglas MD-11
The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 is a widebody trijet manufactured by McDonnell Douglas from 1988 to 2000, with the ultimate three years of manufacturing happening after the merger of McDonnell Douglas and Boeing. It was an improved spinoff of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, manufactured from 1969 to 1989. The DC-10 was primarily a medium to long-range airliner meant for US home routes and transatlantic companies, whereas the MD-11 was designed to match the vary of the Boeing 747-200 and 747SP.
From the outside, the MD-11 may be differentiated from the DC-10 by its stretched fuselage, growing its capability. The wings had been refined to scale back drag and acquired new split-tip winglets, enhancing gas effectivity. The MD-11 would function the brand new Basic Electrical CF6-80 or the Pratt & Whitney PW4000-94, which had been extra highly effective and environment friendly than the engines on the DC-10. On the within, the MD-11 featured a full glass cockpit, eliminating the necessity for a flight engineer, and the plane additionally encompasses a smaller empennage and horizontal stabilizer.
The MD-11 was a reasonably minor overhaul to the DC-10’s design. Whereas it was modernized, McDonnell Douglas’s makes an attempt to promote an improved DC-10 had been a sign of the corporate’s tough monetary state. Points with the DC-10 had price the corporate tens of millions in lawsuits and costly redesigns, whereas the plane additionally confronted demand points as a result of presence of an identical L-1011. The corporate solely had sufficient cash to refresh the trijet MD-11 in an age when twinjets had been clearly the longer term, and the MD-11 solely bought a dismal 200 models.
Catch what different flight trackers miss
Emergency squawks, holds, NOTAMs — reside alerts, no signup.
Open tracker
Catch what different flight trackers miss
Emergency squawks, holds, NOTAMs — reside alerts, no signup.
Open tracker
The Design Of The MD-11’s Tail Engine
Essentially the most distinctive a part of the MD-11 is the tail-mounted engine, often known as the quantity two engine. This design was carried over from the DC-10, the place a trijet format meant that the plane burned much less gas than a 747 with out being topic to overwater flight restrictions. The narrowbody Hawker Siddeley Trident and Boeing 727 had been the primary industrial trijet airliners, whereas the introduction of extra highly effective high-bypass turbofan engines meant that the trijet design may very well be used for widebodies.
On most trijets, the middle engine is put in contained in the plane’s rear fuselage. The entrance of the engine, together with the fan, is basically hidden, and the engine receives air by a curved S-duct. That is the design utilized by nearly all trjets, together with the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, the Boeing 727, the Tupolev TU-154, and the modern-day Dassault Falcon enterprise jet. This design was comparatively simple to service and was extra aerodynamic. Nevertheless, designing an S-duct may be sophisticated and costly, whereas additionally proscribing future growth because the engine is positioned in a small bay inside the fuselage.
The McDonnell Douglas DC-10 and MD-11 are distinctive in that the middle engine is mounted on high of the fuselage, relatively than inside. The engine is similar to the opposite two and encompasses a fan, but it surely’s positioned inside an extended, straight cowling, whereas the vertical stabilizer is mounted on high of the cowling. This configuration is less complicated and cheaper to design, and it was additionally simpler to change to accommodate newer, bigger engines. Nevertheless, it was additionally much less aerodynamic and had a better influence on plane dealing with within the occasion of an engine failure.
The Design Philosophy Of The DC-10
The DC-10 was McDonnell Douglas’s first industrial plane program after the 1967 merger. The brand new firm took a cautious strategy to this system, in search of to reduce prices by utilizing applied sciences and design components from the DC-8 and DC-9 applications. The middle engine is an ideal instance, because the design is much less aerodynamic than an S-duct, but it surely was cheaper to develop.
The DC-10 competed in opposition to the Lockheed L-1011 TriStar, which was basically the identical plane because the DC-10. Lockheed, nevertheless, designed the L-1011 to be the world’s most technologically superior airliner. However whereas this earned the L-1011 respect and admiration from passengers and crew, the comparative simplicity of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 might have given it the sting over the TriStar.
The DC-10 entered service earlier than the L-1011, and it was cheaper to accumulate, too. As well as, McDonnell Douglas was a confirmed producer with established enterprise relations, whereas Lockheed had beforehand exited the industrial plane market in 1961. Whereas the DC-10’s status was marred by early accidents associated to its cargo door design, the kind bought properly over 100 extra models to airways in comparison with the L-1011. The DC-10 turned referred to as a sturdy workhorse for big flag carriers world wide, lauded for its simplicity, reliability, and sturdiness.
The Failure Of The McDonnell Douglas MD-11
Whereas the DC-10 went on to turn out to be secure and reliable, McDonnell Douglas by no means made cash with this system. Lawsuits from the kind’s early accidents totaled lots of of tens of millions in settlements, and gross sales of this system had been additionally hampered by the truth that the market was solely sufficiently big for one trijet widebody. The twinjet Airbus A300, regardless of being produced by a then-unproven producer, outsold each the DC-10 and L-1011, and McDonnell Douglas discovered itself cash-strapped within the Eighties.
The MD-11 was designed for long-haul flying to compete in opposition to the Airbus A340, Boeing 747-400, and the 777. Nevertheless, whereas the MD-11 beat out the A340 and 777 to the market, it failed to fulfill its payload-range guarantees when launched. Regardless of being a trijet, the MD-11 burned extra gas than the four-engined A340, whereas excessive ETOPS rankings, initially pioneered with the Boeing 767, enabled the twinjet Boeing 777 and Airbus A330 to function equally lengthy routes.
Late Twentieth-Century Lengthy-Vary Widebodies
Entry Into Service
Gross sales
Boeing 747-400
1989
697
McDonnell Douglas MD-11
1990
200
Airbus A340-200/300
1993
246
Boeing 777-200/200ER/300
1995
570
The MD-11 turned out to be an inefficient plane that did not reside as much as expectations. The tail engine, a relic of an period lengthy handed that was carried over because of a scarcity of funds, ensured that the plane by no means stood an opportunity in opposition to twinjets. The A340 and 777 ended up being extra succesful than the MD-11 whereas concurrently burning much less gas, and Airbus A330s had largely the identical capability whereas nonetheless being able to working transatlantic routes. The MD-11 solely bought 200 examples, one of many worst industrial plane failures in trendy historical past.

Associated
Why The McDonnell Douglas MD-11 Will not Be Retired Anytime Quickly
Whereas the kind was not well-liked as a passenger jet, the MD-11 nonetheless flies right this moment, working cargo flights. These jets will fly into the 2030s.
The place The MD-11 Discovered Marginal Success
The MD-11 was not a aggressive passenger plane in opposition to its opponents within the Nineties. Within the cargo market, nevertheless, the MD-11 was probably the most trendy and environment friendly plane in the marketplace. The MD-11 had been supplied as a freighter since day one, whereas a freighter model of the Airbus A340 or first-generation Boeing 777 had by no means been supplied. The second-generation 777 featured a freighter variant; nevertheless, the 777F solely debuted in 2009, years after the MD-11 went out of manufacturing.
The MD-11 was the perfect new-build freighter out there in the marketplace in its time, with extra capability and vary than the 767-300F, whereas burning much less gas than a Boeing 747. Over 1 / 4 of all MD-11s bought had been the MD-11F, and cargo airways grew their MD-11 fleets as passenger MD-11s turned out there on the used market within the 2000s. The plane sort soldiered on till the mid-to-late 2010s, because the MD-11 fleet started to age out, growing upkeep prices.
Plane
Entry Into Service
McDonnell Douglas MD-11F
1991
Boeing 747-400F
1993
Boeing 767-300F
1995
Boeing 777F
2009
Airbus A330-200F
2010
Gasoline price is way from all the prices of working an airliner, and cargo airways are particularly delicate to capital prices. For cargo carriers, a much less environment friendly, cheaper plane is usually higher than a extra environment friendly, dearer freighter. This is the reason the MD-11 continued to be extensively used even years after twinjet freighters entered service. At the moment, many MD-11s are over 30 years previous, and the kind is regularly being retired by its two largest operators, FedEx and UPS. Nevertheless, this iconic, fuel-thirsty trijet has made its legacy as a reliable workhorse for cargo airways, even when it was ill-suited for the wants of the passenger market.






